<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>20century on Rejmank&#39;s brain dump</title>
    <link>/tags/20century/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 20century on Rejmank&#39;s brain dump</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>By Jiří Rejman, design by Vratislav Vanecek @1cha.co</copyright>
    
	<atom:link href="/tags/20century/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Zapotocký by Michal Stehlík</title>
      <link>/books/zapotocky/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/books/zapotocky/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The question often asked when someomne see me wit the book is, why read book about someone like Zapotocky? The fisrt answer is usualy something in line with yea I really like this podcast and one of the hosts wrote this book so I naturally want to read it. The more thoughtfull asnwer would be that it is fascinating to read about someone so ordinary accomplishing so much. The book itself is well researched, well written and rellay great read. But comparing it with somethign like Kriegel I can see the motivation of Kriegel, and the desilusion at the end. With Zapotocky I just see how ordinary he was, how scared. He was just tall enough to stand out but not so that he had his head chopped. Or his spine was so flexible that he was always able to survive. I really liked the introduction with the method and inspiration used.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>